Pages

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

September 2009

September 2009

Blow Out (De Palma, 1981) 8
Sally is a great character.
One Missed Call (Valette, 2008) 2
Hot damn that was crappy.
It's almost awe-inspiring in its uselessness. Did I just watch an actual movie, really? Did they actually spend time, money, and physical and mental effort, to make this? Was this more like a paid vacation for the actors considering they're working with nothing? It's kind of fascinating, really.
* Audition (Miike, 1999) 8
W.R. - Mysteries of the Organism (Makavejev, 1971) 8
* Dead & Buried (Sherman, 1981) 5.5
* Pumpkinhead (Winston, 1988) 5
(500) Days of Summer (Webb, 2009) 5
(500) Days of Summer is a movie made entirely out of musings and good points. And it's a movie that thinks movies can be made out of musings and the cleverness of its points. That's why the film is told in bits and pieces, because of its strong belief in its vision of a film built entirely of its writer-director's probably-somewhere-out-there-in-list-form series of musings and good points, lucid observations, and clever cinematic renderings of love neurosis.
There's the scene in the film where Joseph Gordon-Levitt has a breakdown in a company meeting and gets on a soapbox about greeting cards. It's one of those in-your-face points the film has to make, and by god it makes sure to make it. But in making itself (or its character) so pedantically shout out this mildly revealing and I'd thought already pretty obvious epiphany, it just made me uncomfortable. I thought, "Everyone knows this. Everyone knows greeting cards are bullshit. So the fact that it has to make this point so pivotal must mean that this movie is yelling at someone who apparently doesn't get it enough..." Followed immediately by: "I hope it's not me. I get it, you're smarter than me, movie!"
The film, Webb, his screenplay and the film's whole slickly-packaged DNA as a quirky, edgy concept picture is driven by its unbearable omniscience. Not that it necessarily gives all the answers - the film pleasantly surprises with its down-to-earth subverting of clean-cut romantic conventions - but yet, when it comes to considering all the questions, the film seems to suggest all the answers are out there to be quickly figured out. The film becomes a bit po-faced and didactic when, in its query-response structure (its happy-time/sad-time, fantasy/reality, dialectical jumping in time), it's practically giving an answer a mere moment after any possibly challenging, and possibly challengingly upsetting, question is posed.
The ultimate message is admirable: a romance film all about the folly of romantics in a world that fosters and encourages the lighting of flames beneath asses and the will to get moving again -- then, the resultant growth and the cornucopias of opportunity. The film is mostly likable, slickly romantic, and, thankfully, often truly perceptive, with a good knack for melancholy to get you in the right mood. All much, much too slickly packaged, but if you have a great postmodern idea that you know'll be a hit with the audiences (plus with the way-too-appealing Joshua Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel in the leads), what can you do? Pump up the indie rock.
One Missed Call (Miike, 2003) 7
Silent Hill (Gans, 2006) 4
The Legend of Hell House (Hough, 1973) 5.5
Exte (Sono, 2007) 5
Exte has the usual Sono attributes going for it, despite it being the Japanese genre auteur's obligatory send-up of J-horror, a la what Miike was going for with One Missed Call. Sono has a knack for appealing cuteness (that is, idiosyncratic cuteness), his drama is genuine and candidly shot, and his vision - his commitment to genre and sensory thrills that address an eccentric and personality-filled, adult and abusive world - is intact here. But I just don't think Sono's my guy. This film is way scattershot, often obnoxious, and I enjoyed the film much more when it was being whimsical to when it was being a horror film with a plot. As a horror film, it's redundant; got tired of the cops and the main antagonist really quickly. Chiaki Kuriyama and her hip-hop roommate are very appealing here, though.
Portrait of Jason (Clarke, 1967) 5.5
An hour and forty-five minute interview with a 60s-living, black, gay man, one-time hustler, now aspiring nightclub owner and performer. It is lively subject matter, with a jovial subject who knows how to entertain with stories, and it's also a knowingly intrusive probe into the man's life, as we see his tales go from anecdotal to deeply personal, as he gets progressively drunker (and soon even breaks out a joint) as the evening progresses. The B&W camera captures Jason lounging, pacing, and generally inhabiting a rather neutral living-room-type space as he speaks to the camera and is given short, prodding directions from Clarke and co., behind the camera and never on screen, as they occasionally zoom in inscrutably on his face and then go to momentary blackness (but with the audio recording device still taping) as they switch the celluloid that Jason's vocal self-offering clearly surpasses in surely a number of ways, including both duration and honesty. The film is often engaging, due to the subject laying all his cards on the table with touching genuineness, but ultimately, the work is a monotonous exercise that, at some points, begins to smack of injudiciousness, not only in running time but in how freely and without guidance Clarke and her associates let this man bare his soul in service of their austere little exercise - although likely intentional, for the rather clinical regard towards Jason coming from behind the camera seems equal measure familiarity and acceptance, as it is cold analysis.
* Dark Water (Nakata, 2002) 5.5
Halloween II (Zombie, 2009) 5
Trouble Every Day (Denis, 2001) 8
I feel like Denis making a film here with a relatively chugging plot and narrative variety did her a great service. The separate plot threads that give her different locations and character behaviors to work with provoked nice and varied style from her, which keeps it from achieving the certain monotony of her two other films I've seen, Beau Travail and Friday Night - elliptical mood pieces that fling narrative drive wayside for the building of mood.
It's an ingeniously structured film, too. It weaves romantic-scientific waywardness not just with its two central couples but with close attention to a slew of supporting characters and even bit characters. It ends on a gentle and ambivalent note that, similar to Redacted, ends up being the perfect way to end the film and left me with a positive final impression. It's a very romantic film... even with the demented Cat People-like plot point involving Gallo's enforced onanistic lifestyle (which, looked at as concession made to having any relationship with his fresh-faced new wife, is still a bit romantic). I'm surprised no other vampire movie's had thought this element up sooner. And is there another horror film (per se) out there that makes zero attempt to scare or be horror-y like this one?
Redacted (De Palma, 2008) 5
Redacted gets off to a good start by not making any sense. The video diary suddenly segues into a glossy documentary. Thus we have a camera inside a car it has no reason to be in. Then it segues into an Iraqi news segment. It's a barrage of media without any throughline, and its level opaqueness makes it fascinating. But when the film starts to systematically construct the moments that lead to the film's central event, the film's proud indelicateness just becomes that: rote and indelicate. There's worth to be had from strong and unaffected characterizations, such as the two main offending soldiers, and likewise from a strong and unsoftened plot. But De Palma's staging just gets more and more uninteresting as it goes along, culminating in a scene of atrocity that comes off more contrived than upsetting. The film regains itself a bit towards the end with more interestingly associative use of mixed media, then a final scene - the one back in the US - that I found really worked and was a perfect, expertly ambivalent way to finish the film.
* Ju-on: The Grudge (Shimizu, 2003) 4.5

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

August 2009

August 2009

* The Awful Truth (McCarey, 1937)     7.5
* The Leopard Man (Tourneur, 1943)     9
* Carnival of Souls (Harvey, 1962)     8.5
* I Walked With a Zombie (Tourneur, 1943)     9
Kill Bill Vol. 1 (Tarantino, 2003)     7
Inglourious Basterds (Tarantino, 2009)     8.5
Inglourious Basterds is a vibrant and sensitive resurrection of old-fashioned filmmaking.  It recalls the day when films could move slowly, replete with full-blooded dialogue scenes, as long as they were taut with drama and emotions. Inglousious Basterds is actually Tarantino's most traditional film, classical Hollywood entertainment in all its theatrical and steadied beats. Mixed in, though, is Tarantino's meta concerns and, now, thankfully, a regard for history that is educated, strongly researched, and deals seriously with war, its mechanics (witness the Hans Landa character's playing of the field), and its repercussions (seen in the tragic failed romance-made-in-cinema-heaven of Shosanna and Fredrik Zoller)  - critically, with a sense of distance, and with a straightforward and clearheaded refusal to exploit (even the big death of You-Who-Watched-the-Film-Know-Who is dark and burdened instead of a glorious ahistorical shenanigan).  
Finally, Tarantino's Godard-channeling is finally clicking, since Tarantino and his staccato beats choreographed to human movement are now backgrounded by the most politically loaded and genuinely rarefied symbols he's utilized yet - period pomp, officers in full raiment, old foreign movie posters, etc.
* The Village (Shyamalan, 2004)     5
* Pulp Fiction (Tarantino, 1993)     8
Pulp Fiction is really good. It's not loud or over-the-top - it's quiet and atmospheric, and without being dry. Tarantino's directing is unobtrusive, observant. Very soulful, too, with his use of music. We can sit and listen to Marcellus methodically lay out instructions to Butch because he makes it so Rhames' voice seems to croon to the accompanying beat. I thought I'd have a sour reaction to his screenplay and dialogue here, but it's pretty consistently evocative and poetic.
Now does the film and its vignette nature and its evocations have much of a "thematic center"? I'm having problems pinpointing its ultimate moral and philosophical intentions. If Tarantino didn't write and direct human behavior and a textured world so well, Pulp Fiction would be too high concept for me to like very much or find much meaning in. "Deconstruction, yay!" of course, and, like I said, the dialogue never isn't flirting with social and emotional quandaries (the Mia-Vincent exchanges surprised me - the Somoan never put a finger on her feet, it seems!), but the film is undoubtedly set on "confection" mode.
* Opera (Argento, 1987)     6.5
Opera is a ridiculously awesome platter of Argento goods. Of course, it's no where nearing profound, it's dramatically non-existent and typically (of Argento) dry, the subtext or meta-commentary on high art and sadomasochism is pretty basic, etc. etcetera... but Argento sure knows how to make a freaky, exciting, sweeping, and most importantly visually witty film.  And it doesn't disappoint with the funky opening credit sequence, surely one of Argento's funkiest in a career of groovy and funky opening credit sequences.
You Can Count On Me (Lonergan, 2000)     8
* "Cigarette Burns" (Carpenter, 2007) (Masters of Horror, Season 1) (TV Series)     ****
* "Dance of the Dead" (Hooper, 2007) (Masters of Horror, Season 1) (TV Series)     ***
* Lifeforce (Hooper, 1985)     5.5
Vampires (Carpenter, 1998)     4.5
Notre Musique (Godard, 2001)     6.5
Strange Circus (Sono, 2002)     6
* "Dreams in the Witch House" (Gordon, 2007) (Masters of Horror, Season 1) (TV Series)     ***
* Assault on Precinct 13 (Carpenter, 1977)     8.5
"The Damned Thing" (Hooper, 2008) (Masters of Horror, Season 2) (TV Series)     *1/2
"The Washingtonians" (Medak, 2008) (Masters of Horror, Season 2) (TV Series)     ***
"Pro-Life" (Carpenter, 2008) (Masters of Horror, Season 2) (TV Series)     * (out of 5)
Made in U.S.A. (Godard, 1966)     6

Friday, July 17, 2009

July 2009

July 2009

[REC]  (Balaguero/Plaza, 2007)     4.5
Not bad and better than I expected. It successfully becomes more intense as it goes along, and the climax is excellently atmospheric and despairing. The religious angle that is brought in all of sudden at the end is a bit too obligatory of Catholixploitation, and is ultimately rather simplistic oogie-boogie backstory, but the quasi-mysticism provides undeniable atmospherics and it offers the viewer a somewhat evocative little tale of religion's rose-colored exploitation of facts morphing into terrifying science, with the final menace being a specter of disconcerting biological, anatomical decay.
The Tenant (Polanski, 1976)     7.5
Not as visually eloquent and crisply dynamic in expressing visual ideas as Rosemary's Baby, but it is much more expansive thematically, with much to intimate about the selfsameness of experience - the experience here being alienation due to the pressures and hypocrisy of apartment-dwelling life. It reminded me a bit of Inland Empire, both being about psychotic emanations of shared emotional existences under specific circumstances (Inland Empire: method acting, The Tenant: apartment living, both: Polishness).  Well, by "Polishness," I really mean "foreignness," which I suppose only The Tenant is particularly about.
Eaten Alive (Hooper, 1977)     6
* Spontaneous Combustion (Hooper, 1990)     5.5
Escape from L.A. (Carpenter, 1996)     5.5
Brüno (Clark, 2009)     4.5
Good for what it is: an outrageous stunt film with, just barely, the rhetorical purposes of making gayness prominent in a piece of mainstream entertainment, as well as a cornucopia of other topical stuff like [talking penises, and] absurdist mock peace talks... all of it surely weak and little-researched (it takes a while to realize these films, Borat and Brüno, are actually not trying to be like classical documentaries - their "mockumentary" status is weak in a way because they're more like mocku-"diary films"), but strengthened by the sheer novelty and daring-do of Baron Cohen's schtick.
* Scream (Craven, 1996)     4.5
* Death Proof (Tarantino, 2007)     9.5
* Tobe Hooper's Night Terrors (Hooper, 1993)     6
* Dead-Alive (Braindead) (Jackson, 1991)     8
The Sentinel (Winner, 1977)     3
The Sentinel is occasionally beguiling - Chris Sarandon's sturdy but two-sided, ultimately prosecutable lover; the moment where Cristina Raines insists a book is inscribed in Latin when it's not - but this is quite the woefully misguided film, that only deals with its rather implicative religious tale in the manner a cheesy horror movie would. And this is undoubtedly a cheesy horror movie. It's quite the representation of holy callings, and what exactly is it's correlation between its innerly troubled super model heroine and the gauntlet she's forced to take up?  Sexual trauma as sure enough conditioning for the life of monastic diligence? SPOILER The final shot of this beauty Cristina Raines relegated to a habit and the suddenly weathered skin of the cloistered does ring with sort of tragedy.
* The Fog (Carpenter, 1980)     5.5
A beautiful-looking and strikingly photographed film, that boasts the creepiness desired by Carpenter who aimed to create simply an old-fashioned ghost story. But it's perhaps too modest for its own good, its small-scale, slasher film approach and prop-costume, smoke machine aesthetic being inadequate for its story about a town damned by its ancestors, and not matching up to the smarts it occasionally possesses. The film ultimately comes off feeling rinky-dink and frivolous, especially considering Carpenter's film in its original print ran so short, the opening campfire scene (a good scene, though) and the autopsy room walking-dead scare (a bad scene) were shot after initial wrap in order to pad out the running time.
* Escape from New York (Carpenter, 1981)     6.5

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

June 2009

June 2009

Ghosts of Mars (Carpenter, 2001)     5
Oh, this wasn't so bad. I thought the material ranged from not bad to fantastic: the characters, the screenplay, plot developments, dialogue, etc. I found it, actually, very dense and intelligent in its comic-book sociology. I was struck by how comprehensively Carpenter both adopted old Hollywood Western story elements with implicit deconstructivist commentary, but simultaneously never disfavors or pacifies the survivalist pragmatism of its cop/criminal characters, nor makes them any less than likable, as is the practice in the old-fashioned Hollywood action films of yore.
Carpenter takes this pragmatism and satisfactorily splays it, so as not to just be about "brave vs. cowardly" or "good vs. bad" as is conventional in the classical Western of pre-progressivist era. Now, Carpenter mixes in the push of societal shifts (the film takes place in a mankind under a new matriarchal order), modern urban upbringing, and the nitty-gritty of what gets a pure survivalist through the day (which includes here, most interestingly, the good and bad of recreational drug use). It was great seeing faces like Jason Statham and Clea Duvall playing characters not glamorized or de-glamorized, instead ones that would usually be played by anonymous background actors. I was really struck by the Ice Cube-Henstridge interplay, too.
But, despite that, in the end, this is definitely not an improvement on Assault on Precinct 13, which also offers an open look at criminality and which this film is practically a remake. Carpenter's directing has always been characterized by its flat beats and mechanical, no-less-than (or, arguably, more-than) efficient style, but before it was in service of really careful sequencing and often lovely mise en scene. Here, his cinematic vocabulary seems to have disappeared and he's speaking like a thorough layman. The film has its formal idiosyncrasy, though. The rhythm of the film and its use of dissolves is particularly effective. It's too bad Carpenter was content with the film's cheap-looking production design and villain costuming, which go a long way in sinking the film. I think the film is very competent. It's just Carpenter sets his visual standards so freaking low here for some reason.
Friday Night (Denis, 2002)     8
Martyrs (Laugier, 2008)     6
* Full Metal Jacket (Kubrick, 1987)     9
4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days (Mungiu, 2007)     7
* Prince of Darkness (Carpenter, 1987)     5.5
The Ruins (Smith, 2008)     5.5
Brief Crossing (Breillat, 2001)     7
The Game (Fincher, 1997)     6
Beau travail (Denis, 1999)     8
Claire Denis' technique isn't quite as polished as I like to see in my films - in fact, I'd call it almost sloppy at times - but deliberateness and authorial command definitely come through, with stunning elegance at numerous times, even if Denis' style of impromptu visualization leads to too many moments utilizing the grace of a slowly crawling camera to little effect. I wasn't with the film beat by beat - as a story told with explicit fragmentation and a willful avoidance of continuity and clarity, I can't help but feel we don't understand the two central characters as much as we should. But it's a preferred trade-in for what the film does so elliptically evoke concerning the legionnaire life, environment, and what it nurtures. This thoroughly expressionistic but finely detailed sketching of masculine regimentation is even more impressive and daring knowing a woman is behind the camera.
About the last scene, while it's certainly very affecting, I can't help but wish there was some context given to it, which might lend it a certified reality. I find I need to think of it as a moment that actually happens and not just as a fantasy scene if I want to appreciate it fully. As something that happened, it means he could dance. As a fantasy scene, it's inexplicable and just something Denis would throw in mid-filming when she found out her lead actor could dance.
UP (Docter, 2009)     7
Bram Stoker's Dracula (Coppola, 1992)     6
Sam Raimi's Drag Me To Hell would have been an achievement much in the same way Francis Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula is, if Raimi had made Drag Me To Hell, you know, better. The two films even have similar slam-bang openings and shock, tactile title cards (which never fail).
As Raimi wishes to throwback to certain old-school schlock, Dracula also takes a classical-type story burdened with lots of codings and de-codes them using overt artificial style, Coppola throwbacking majorly to silent film aesthetic and storytelling beats.
Bram Stoker's Dracula is an uneven film that gets increasingly tiresome once Helsing and the men start actively seeking out Dracula, leading to a very weak climactic act, but there's too many great moments here to completely dismiss, especially in the first half of the film. The number of gleefully bizarre moments only Coppola's capable of is unbeatable, such as the extravagant visual feast that is Harker's first entrance into Dracula's castle and the shot of the spectacularly made-up Giant Bat form of Dracula moping out of sight when Mira catches him in the garden with Lucy, complete with a practically slapstick iris out. The characterization of the Lucy character takes on a particular poignance, her chipper and giving personality seemingly irrepressible even as all her vitality is slowly being sucked from her - perhaps Coppola's way to undermine our expectations that the vapid sex kitten is always easily susceptible to the draining of inner character, as the whole film serves to re-evaluate the Victorian era and its gentrified sexual mores, drained of the true, potent, and certainly blasphemous passion that Dracula embodies.
Fight Club (Fincher, 1999)     8
Se7en (Fincher, 1995)     5.5
* The Funhouse (Hooper, 1981)     7
Beyond Therapy (Altman, 1987)     7
Yeah, Altman lyricism is just too irresistible for me, even if the film makes very little in the way of concluding, transcendent statements and this film probably shows off the worst of Altman's tendency for puerile caricature. There's too much silliness here to make the film work dramatically, but if that final scene (starting with the hilarious "shoot em up") doesn't tie things up nicer than I'd expected. Glenda Jackson is fantastic and hilarious.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

May 2009

May 2009

Star Trek (Abrams, 2009) 7
Drag Me To Hell (Raimi, 2009) 5
Orca (Anderson, 1977) 3.5

Recommended Reviews: Film Freak Central on Orca

Snatch (Ritchie, 2000) 4
Sleeper (Allen, 1973) 6.5
Love and Death (Allen, 1975) 6
Adventureland (Mottola, 2009) 6
Body Bags (Carpenter & Hooper, 1993) (TV) 4
Irreversible (Noé, 2002) 5.5
The Piano (Campion, 1993) 9

Best demystification of hoop skirts ever.
Shocker (Craven, 1989) 3.5
Wes Craven is the showman of the horror auteurs. He's modish and trendy and he shows it in his horror films. He's also a goofball, though, and a sucker for novelty, and that shows most explicitly in Shocker. Mitch Pileggi, a face known to any X-Files fan, tries valiantly to be the next Freddy Krueger, rolling off one-liners in mid-slaughter. It would all be just dull if the film didn't benefit from Craven's dream logic-inspired, sight gag-inclined knack at inanity. The otherworldly presence of the dead girlfriend, who seems to appear with the alternating and counter-productive purposes of either assisting, turning on, or fruitlessly freaking the hell out the film's hero, is one of the film's stranger plot elements, in a film full of strange plot elements. This includes the entire high school football team helping out foil the killer's plot, and a lecherous psychopath body-jumping into a six-year-old girl. Amusing, but pointless.
Splinter (Wilkins, 2008) 5.5
JLG/JLG (Godard, 199 ) 6.5
Nouvelle Vague (Godard, 1990) 7.5
Passion (2nd) (Godard, 1985) 7
* War of the Worlds (Spielberg, 2005) 4.5

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

April 2009

April 2009

The Midnight Meat Train (Kitamura, 2008)     4.5
Passion (Godard, 1982)     7
Slumdog Millionaire (Boyle, 2008)     3
* Images (Altman, 1972)     7.5
Sauve qui peut (la vie) (Godard, 1980)     7.5
The Apartment Complex (Hooper, 1999)     4
Tarnation (Caouette, 2003)     5.5
* Tobe Hooper's Night Terrors (Hooper, 1993)     5.5

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

March 2009

March 2009

Four Flies on Grey Velvet (Argento, 1971)     6.5
* The Wicker Man (Hardy, 1973)     8.5
Smiley Face (fullscreen) (Araki, 2007)     4
* Quantum of Solace (Forster, 2007)     3.5
Saw IV (Bousman, 2007)     1.5
Tobe Hooper's Night Terrors (Hooper, 1993)     5
Sexy Beast (Glazer, 2000)     8
Tokyo Sonata (Kurosawa, 2009)     7
License to Live (Kurosawa, 1998)     7.5
Eyes of the Spider (Kurosawa, 1998)     n/a
Serpent's Path (Kurosawa, 1998)     7.5
A Scanner Darkly (Linklater, 2006)     5.5
Stuck (Gordon, 2008)     8
South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (Parker & Stone, 1999)     5
Week End (Godard, 1967)     7.5